Coincidentally, I just saw some similar pictures and data on the telly.

NASA - Antarctic Ice Loss Speeds Up, Nearly Matches Greenland Loss

Here is a more recent article ^




While I am not skeptical of 'climate change' at all (it's inevitable), I am skeptical of:

1. The world is going to end within 10 years, as a result of 'Global Warming'
2. CO2 and human actions are primarily at fault for 'Global Warming'
3. That both science and the media have approached this problem objectively and unbiased.

With regards to number 3 --> Why is any opposition completely disallowed, in the case of Anthropogenic (human-caused) Global Warming? In political debates, there is always an opposition, regardless of how fantastic or controversial it is, to state clearly the points of the other side (in this case, those points being that the world has had 'climate change' since the beginning of time), especially when all of our actions and reactions are to be based on, not fact, but theory and theory alone.