You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, take part in contests, and access many other special "members only" features.
I think love (without lust) doesn't automatically mean it's bereft of passion. So I chose love. But if you're in for a short-term gig, then go for lust! lol
Coexisting gracefully with the unresolved. - GFisms
Vegito ŕ Kimi: "But damn. Why's this so damn scary? This is worse than someone breaking into my house and chasing me with a knife."
I can't really see this issue as being simply a two sided coin. At this point and time I wouldn't choose love but I wouldn't choose lust either. To me there has to be a middle ground or gray area for those who don't lean fully toward one side of the spectrum.
Besides many people at a younger age aren't ready for love. Having a relationship may not be considered love but its not lust either.
This is just my interpretation of the context of each term so I could probably thinking on a different level than others.
CATCHPHRASE OF THE WEEK: Mattell, misleading children since 1982.
I am the only one of my kind. An oddity; unique. An abberation. Do you know what it's like? To be utterly alone? So alone...Is it any wonder I scream with rage and sorrow?