|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Hockey Hit the ice in here. |
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||
|
||
|
Rule Change Discussion
1. 5 minute fighting penalty results in a 5-minute 4-on-4. Might make coaches and players be a bit more cautious in fights. 2. Goalies CAN BE HIT...take out the trapazoid but any goalie leaving the crease to play the puck can be checked. 3. Pucks played into the bench should be included into the delay of game rule. 4. Any player who jumps or reaches up to play the puck with his hand is given a 2-minute delay of game penalty. Discuss and share your own rule ideas. |
| Join GeneralForum.com Today! |
Join GeneralForum.com today for FREE!GeneralForum.com is the fastest growing general forum on the web!
» Click here to join the fun! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
= Icing should be whistled when the puck crosses the goal line- players should not be required to touch. |
|
#3
|
||
|
||
|
i agree on the no touch icing...guys are getting seriously hurt trying to chase down pucks to prevent icing. either the goalie should touch to keep play going or auto icing.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
1. 5 minute fighting penalty results in a 5-minute 4-on-4. Might make coaches and players be a bit more cautious in fights.
Wouldn't that make less talented teams hesitate on fighting?? I'd hate that. Quote:
Quote:
Other than that I'd like the shootout to be extened to 5 rounds, 0 points for loosing in overtime, no instigter, and a 2 inch trim of goalie pads. |
|
#5
|
||
|
||
|
the 2-points for a win and 0 for a loss is something i think we all agree on.
actually the 5-minute 4-on-4 fighting might help less talented teams by opening up the ice more. one less player to fight through to get to the offensive zone. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Echoes; 03-29-2009 at 08:54 PM.. |
|
#7
|
||
|
||
|
i've seen teams get outskated by opponents that shouldn't be able to on a 4-on-4. it has potential to even increase scoring.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I like this idea alot. I always wondered why this didnt happen anyways. Would create more offense and more excitement. Quote:
Ehhh I dont really like this idea all that much. I dont think goalies should be checked...I would like to see goalie interference toned down a little bit but I dont like this rule. Quote:
Terrible terrible terrible idea. I dont mind the delay of game rule but this is ridiculous. Quote:
Another terrible idea. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first one seems like the only good idea. Checking goalies? Come on.
|
|
#10
|
||
|
||
|
the goalies wanna play the puck more then they should be fair game outside the crease. hell, goalies are supposed to get a 2-minute delay of game for covering up the puck to stop play if they aren't in the crease and it has yet to be called.
|
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| change, discussion, rule |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WBC to adopt extra inning baserunner rule and others | Constantine | Baseball | 7 | 01-31-2009 04:14 PM |
| Ban prohibiting CC in Federal Parks lifted | pro2A | Political News | 4 | 12-07-2008 08:36 AM |
| Star Trek: The Discussion Thread | Steerpike | Big Blockbusters | 64 | 06-17-2008 06:17 AM |