Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
Thats all you say in your posts Cons. "you are loosing a uphill battle and loosing it" "stop embarassing yourself and deal with it" "your posts are making you look stupid and shutup" "your wrong and im right" "im right and your wrong" "the joker is better than everyone else so deal with it"
|
That's always a good way to start a post, with a nice, off-base and ill-perceived set of assumptions about someone. The little Joker quip at the end there was pretty adorable though, so I'll be nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
Pokemon was at number one? No Pokemon was not at number one POKEMONS is #1
Isn't Pokemon Red one game? While Pokemon Blue is another game? And isn't Pokemon Green another game? That is a total of THREE games. Not 1.. not 2.. 3 whole games. They all 3 share number 1 spot. Why? They're not the same game.
|
Pokemon Green, first of all, was
never released in the US. It was an older version of Blue that became Pokemon Blue when sent to the States. I'm trying to follow your logic though . . they're number 1 . . because they're different games? You're not making much sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
1)They have different colors, for 1 point.
|
Because color is
all the difference.
*Walks away quietly*
Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
2) 2nd of all one was only available in Japan. 3rd of all the 2 North American versions were absolutley not similiar in every way. That's why when i was in what.. 3rd grade? Every one wanted both games because they needed to catch something that was not in their respective game. Does that not qualify as an indiference?
|
Actually, both games are perfectly
exact except for eleven Pokemon (out of 150 available) that varied in availability, it may have been a scheme but you can't say it didn't get people to play together. They're grouped together because the games
are the same, padd.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
3)The sales just boosted up for both games because people were introduced to one color and in turn raised to demand for the other one.. is that not as biased as buying a bundled game only because it comes with the system?
|
Actually, no not at all and it's flat astounding that you can't tell the difference. Let's say you buy a Playstation4 and it comes automatically bundled with Final Fantasy 23, no matter what. You hate the series but you wanted the PS4, yet you contributed to the sales numbers of FF23. When you buy Pokemon Blue, you
are not forced to buy Red, unlike a bundle deal. To beat the game, you don't need Red! If you want to catch every single Pokemon, then yes, you need Red but that's why people played with buddies. Take my brother and I. I got Blue, he got Red and we traded. If they were the same game, Nintendo would
still be making the same profit.
They're not two different games, they're two slightly varied versions of the
same title!
Quote:
Originally Posted by padd
Not everyone who argues with you is wrong, deal with it.
|
Oh please, save it for someone who cares.
10-19-2008, 11:20 AM
Linear Mode
Similar Threads