|
|
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, take part in contests, and access many other special "members only" features.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely FREE so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
|
 |
03-24-2008, 10:18 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Song, a feast for souls.
Posts: 6,843
My Mood: 
|
Food stamps and junk food?
Please note:
This is in no way meant to demoralize anyone who needs assistance in feeding their family.
I know it's not actual "stamps" that are given out anymore, the poor can now hold their heads up a little higher and slide the governmnet issued card right through the machine, leaving most people waiting in line none the wiser as to their situation.
I was in line behind someone not long ago who was pretty obvious about their form of payment. I do my best not to judge others, but sometimes I just can't help myself. This young girl hardly looked old enough to be mother to the 3 kids hanging onto the shopping cart, but yet they did call her "mommy" so there you have it.
It wasn't the fact that she was using my money to buy food for her kids, it was the fact that there was nothing but junk being rung up that got to me.
I'm sorry, but if you're destitute enough to need help buying groceries, then I think it should be used on nourishing food, not a bunch of sweets and snacks that do nothing for a childs health.
I'm sure there are ways to restrict what is being purchased with the states money, so why allow this?
|
"There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed." ~E.H.
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 10:22 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
fairly unique
Posts: 5,048
My Mood: 
|
I agree with that, if you need assistance, and there is nothing wrong with that, at least put the money to good use with fruits, veggies, milk, and nourishing food. Not stuff that will make the kids overweight, lazy, and rot their teeth.
|
Himeko: I can change a tire. 
Himeko: Oh yeah. So my dad took the flat into this tire place
Himeko: And they tried to see why it went flat
Jeanie: awesome
Jeanie: that you can change it
Jeanie: ya big dyke
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 10:31 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Through the Looking Glass
Posts: 20,684
My Mood: 
|
Well restricting things might stop some people from buying junk food, but they will just use other money for the things that food stamps can't buy. I've seen people buying cigarettes with their own money and using food stamps to buy some food. There will always be loopholes unless we disallow people who qualify for food stamps from buying ANYTHING but food... since they could always go to a different line to buy cigarettes or whatever else.
But do we want to live in a country where the government is so involved in what we can or can't buy? I think there is a fine line here and I'm not really sure what the best solution would be.
|
I may end up weighing 500lbs but I'll still find a way to pull it off sexily at the nudist colony. ~ysabel
GF Official MySpace Page.
You can't make accusations like that without evidence. I ashume that you have some? ~Dr. Carrington
Counting down to New Year's Day:
29 days 5 hours 35 minutes
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 10:35 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Song, a feast for souls.
Posts: 6,843
My Mood: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrix
Well restricting things might stop some people from buying junk food, but they will just use other money for the things that food stamps can't buy. I've seen people buying cigarettes with their own money and using food stamps to buy some food. There will always be loopholes unless we disallow people who qualify for food stamps from buying ANYTHING but food... since they could always go to a different line to buy cigarettes or whatever else.
|
I have no problem with someone using money they have "earned" to buy whatever they want, but if you need the states assistance to feed your family, then I think it should be used for nourishing foods only.
|
"There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed." ~E.H.
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 10:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Fairy Nerdmother
Posts: 3,360
My Mood: 
|
I'm not sure what the difference is between WIC and what you saw the other day, Angel, who qualifies for what & all that, but WIC only allows for certain nutritious foods to be purchased.
I have a real problem with people who can't buy food for their families using assistance money to buy unhealthy foods.
|
I dream of a world in which chickens can cross the road and no one questions their motives.
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 11:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Through the Looking Glass
Posts: 20,684
My Mood: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelsPeak
I have no problem with someone using money they have "earned" to buy whatever they want, but if you need the states assistance to feed your family, then I think it should be used for nourishing foods only.
|
Of course, but in this situation the person was using food stamps and had extra money of their own to buy cigarettes. I was just saying if the government limits what you can buy with food stamps to only nourishing food then people will just use other money for junk food and buy things like milk with food stamps. I guess my point is that if you are on food stamps and can afford to use your own money to buy cigarettes and junk food (assuming food stamps were changed to only be good for healthy food) then maybe you don't need to be on food stamps in the first place. It's a loophole that can't easily be fixed unfortunately.
|
I may end up weighing 500lbs but I'll still find a way to pull it off sexily at the nudist colony. ~ysabel
GF Official MySpace Page.
You can't make accusations like that without evidence. I ashume that you have some? ~Dr. Carrington
Counting down to New Year's Day:
29 days 5 hours 35 minutes
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 01:09 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Just Say No to God
Posts: 4,919
My Mood: 
|
Pretty much a branch of the Welfare Queen argument of the Reagen era; anecdotal stories that discredit the welfare system. Thanks for the disclaimer to prevent this from being a welfare/tax rant thread.
Abuse of the welfare system implies reform rather than reduction.
Food stamps should have a fairly limited range of products. Everything that the FDA says is required semi-often should be covered. Besides that? No way.
The government has a duty to provide nutritional assistance to the poor to provide them with health to not be chronically ill (and thus strain Medicaid) and keep kids and adults able to perform well in jobs/college/school. If it's not nutritional, I don't see its purpose of being covered by food stamps.
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 01:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Registered Member
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanie
I'm not sure what the difference is between WIC and what you saw the other day, Angel, who qualifies for what & all that, but WIC only allows for certain nutritious foods to be purchased.
I have a real problem with people who can't buy food for their families using assistance money to buy unhealthy foods.
|
I've had friends on WIC (women Infants and children) and it seems to be one of the few assistance programs that works. You can buy certain brands of milk, cereal, butter, bread, etc.. staple food. But, you have to buy the store brand or similar.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|