General Forum - Forums about everything!




Political News Discuss the latest speeches, scandals, and policy here. Please be respectful of others opinions. Flaming will NOT be tolerated!

Go Back   GeneralForum.com > Serious Discussion > Political News

Waterproof
Hearing Aid
Your Ad Here! Online Colleges
& Degrees
WOW Gold Buy WOW Gold

» Sponsored Ads
 



  
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, take part in contests, and access many other special "members only" features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely FREE so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-25-2008, 03:33 PM   #71 (permalink)
DaStevez
DaStevez's Avatar
Posts: 9,268
My Mood:
Quote:
Its funny you mention that. Those were the only two times that he actually voted in favor of guns.
They were the only votes to get to Senate. Please, show me these "Illinois" votes you're raving about. Let me guess.. he wants to ban fully automatic guns and limit how many you can buy? Boo Hoo.

Kiss my shiny metal ass!
DaStevez is offline Add to DaStevez's Reputation   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 03:43 PM   #72 (permalink)
pro2A
Comrade
pro2A's Avatar
Posts: 2,473
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
They were the only votes to get to Senate. Please, show me these "Illinois" votes you're raving about. Let me guess.. he wants to ban fully automatic guns and limit how many you can buy? Boo Hoo.
No guns should be banned for the use of law abiding citizens. I've Googled Obamas Illinois record and can't find anything solid... the most I could find is this link

Voted against letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home. (2004)
Voted to let retired police and military police carry concealed weapons. (2004)
Successfully sponsored requirement that law enforcement videotape interrogations of suspects in some serious crimes. (2003)
Successfully sponsored law enforcement study of the race of people pulled over for traffic tickets. (2003)
Helped pass an overhaul of the state’s troubled death penalty system. (2003)
Unsuccessfully sponsored measure to expunge some criminal records and create an employment grant program for ex-criminals. (2002)
Unsuccessfully sponsored limit of one handgun purchase per month. (2000)
Voted against making gang members eligible for the death penalty if they kill someone to help their gang. (2001)

“When freedom shivers in the cold shadow of true peril, it’s always the patriots who first hear the call. When loss of liberty is looming, as it is now the siren sounds first in the hearts of freedom’s vanguard.” -Charlton Heston

http://pro2a-freerepublic.blogspot.com/
http://www.nobama.com/

Counting down to Whitetail Opening Day: I'm probably sitting in a tree stand right now :)
pro2A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 04:46 PM   #73 (permalink)
DaStevez
DaStevez's Avatar
Posts: 9,268
My Mood:
Yeah. Your arguments are failing fast. It must suck to be on a sinking ship.
Quote:
Voted against letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home. (2004)
The key phrase here is "violating local weapons bans." So you want people to be able to use illegal guns in their home? I'm all for self-defense with a gun... as long as that gun is legal and not fully automatic. You're arguing that people should have illegal guns in their house. Obama-3, You-0

Quote:
Voted to let retired police and military police carry concealed weapons. (2004)
And this is a problem to you? You just showed me another instance of Obama voting for legal concealed weapons. Obama-4, You-0

Quote:
Successfully sponsored requirement that law enforcement videotape interrogations of suspects in some serious crimes. (2003)
...What does this have to do with guns and self-defense? Also.. why shouldn't they be videotaped? Doesn't that help keep the suspect's rights from being voilated by illegal interrogation methods? Obama-5, You-0.

Quote:
Successfully sponsored law enforcement study of the race of people pulled over for traffic tickets. (2003)
Equality = Good

Quote:
Helped pass an overhaul of the state’s troubled death penalty system. (2003)
Death Penalty = bad AND more expensive than life in prison.
Quote:
Unsuccessfully sponsored measure to expunge some criminal records and create an employment grant program for ex-criminals. (2002)
Does it say what kind of criminals? It is very hard for a reformed criminal to find a job. No job = more likely to commit crimes to get by again.

Quote:
Unsuccessfully sponsored limit of one handgun purchase per month. (2000)
Congrats, you found a halfway decent argument. Who in their right mind really needs to buy more than one handgun in a month, anyway? It's not like he's taking away your right to buy a gun, he just wants to keep people from hoarding them as much as they could. Big ****ing deal. I don't even see how this is an issue for either side.

Quote:
Voted against making gang members eligible for the death penalty if they kill someone to help their gang. (2001)
Again, death penalty = bad and expensive. Ten years of appeals and housing, plus the costs for the execution and care for the body, are way more expensive than what it would cost to keep a prisoner for life.

And if you even try to argue over-crowding I'm going to pull out my favorite argument and not move from it. Non-violent street criminals need to be dealt with in a way other than sending them off to prison. Jails and prisons aren't working.

Kiss my shiny metal ass!
DaStevez is offline Add to DaStevez's Reputation   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 06:37 PM   #74 (permalink)
pro2A
Comrade
pro2A's Avatar
Posts: 2,473
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
Yeah. Your arguments are failing fast. It must suck to be on a sinking ship.
The key phrase here is "violating local weapons bans." So you want people to be able to use illegal guns in their home? I'm all for self-defense with a gun... as long as that gun is legal and not fully automatic. You're arguing that people should have illegal guns in their house. Obama-3, You-0
A handgun is illegal in Chicago dude. In DC you can't even have a gun loaded in your home. If I PROTECTED myself with a handgun in Chicago the DA would come after me, never mind the guy that just tried to rob me with a knife to my gut.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
And this is a problem to you? You just showed me another instance of Obama voting for legal concealed weapons. Obama-4, You-0
The police cannot be there to protect me. I've had cops tell me this before too, they told me the only one who can protect me is me. Why do they get special treatment, are they above the law? I thought the people we're in charge of this country, not the police. Whats wrong with me carrying to protect myself? Obama opposes that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
...What does this have to do with guns and self-defense? Also.. why shouldn't they be videotaped? Doesn't that help keep the suspect's rights from being voilated by illegal interrogation methods? Obama-5, You-0.
Nothing. It was just another one that was in there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
Equality = Good
Group politics = bad. A cop can't see a 1/4 mile away what color or gender a guy is who is speeding on the interstate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
Congrats, you found a halfway decent argument. Who in their right mind really needs to buy more than one handgun in a month, anyway? It's not like he's taking away your right to buy a gun, he just wants to keep people from hoarding them as much as they could. Big ****ing deal. I don't even see how this is an issue for either side.
Its my God given right. Thats a big enough issue to me. I don't need to answer to the Government, or get permission to buy a gun when they say I can. If I want more then one gun a month what buisness is it to them? Whats to say that they don't make it 6 months next, then a year, then 2 years. It's the first step to eroding the 2nd Amendment away. Obama won't do it fast, he'll do a slow bleed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
And if you even try to argue over-crowding I'm going to pull out my favorite argument and not move from it. Non-violent street criminals need to be dealt with in a way other than sending them off to prison. Jails and prisons aren't working.
Violent criminals should be locked away forever. Murderers should be put to death. They have no place in society. You seem to have this backwards Steve... You and Obama want to prosecute law abiding citizens for having "illegal" guns that shouldn't even be illegal in the first place, but let criminals roam free. This is exactly Obamas point of view and I don't like it.
------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
In case the double negatives get you, this bill was to keep the government from taking away guns that are legal. Obama voted for it, Clinton against it, and McCain for it. Your agrument against him fails there. Obama 1, You 0.
This is the only bill that he voted in favor of. Don't know why he did, but he has gotten an F rating from the NRA since at least 1998.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaSteve View Post
This bill was to keep people from suing companies over their guns being used the wrong way. Obama voted no, Clinton voted no, and McCain voted yes. So, McCain wanted to blame the gun companies for people doing bad things with the guns? How is it their fault that the guns they make are used in a crime when it's not their job to control what happens with the guns. Obama 2, You 0.
I think you have this backwards. McCain voted to protect gun companies from getting sued over some criminal using their gun to commit a crime. If you read the text of the bill (which I have) it explains that only defects in the gun that cause the user to get hurt apply in a lawsuit. So basically you're saying its OK to sue gun manufacturers who have nothing to do with the crimes people commit. Thats what this bill is about.

“When freedom shivers in the cold shadow of true peril, it’s always the patriots who first hear the call. When loss of liberty is looming, as it is now the siren sounds first in the hearts of freedom’s vanguard.” -Charlton Heston

http://pro2a-freerepublic.blogspot.com/
http://www.nobama.com/

Counting down to Whitetail Opening Day: I'm probably sitting in a tree stand right now :)

Last edited by pro2A; 05-25-2008 at 06:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
pro2A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 05:48 PM   #75 (permalink)
DaStevez
DaStevez's Avatar
Posts: 9,268
My Mood:
Dude. You're not even worth my time. This is the reason I tend to stay out of the political discussions, especially with right wing gun nuts. There is no discussion. It's all just finger pointing and hardcore dedication.

I'm done.

Kiss my shiny metal ass!
DaStevez is offline Add to DaStevez's Reputation   Reply With Quote


Reply

  GeneralForum.com > Serious Discussion > Political News

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama, muslims, and endorsements. fleinn Political News 15 03-04-2008 10:19 AM
Barack Obama is tougher on terror than the other guy! fleinn Political News 11 09-10-2007 06:24 AM
Obama Takes First Step Toward Running in ’08 Kazmarov Law and Political Theory 2 01-17-2007 10:32 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Site designed and maintained by NURV® Original Concepts, Graphics, and Design Copyright © NURV® 2008
All user submitted content, threads and posts becomes the copyright-protected property of GeneralForum.com unless previously copyrighted.
The views and opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily the views of the staff or administration.
We are not responsible, nor can we be held liable for information posted on this site, or what it influences you to do.
Rules & Privacy Policy

Waterproof Hearing Aid | Poker Design | Web Design | Game Forum | Pop Culture News | Money Forum | Money Complex | Stephen King